Prove your machine learning skills
Many people have trained a model on a clean tutorial dataset. Fewer can explain why a model that scored well offline fails in use. Lemma records that judgement through live reviews, assessments and projects you connect.
What machine learning competence looks like
A competent ML practitioner asks whether a model is needed before building one, and sets a simple baseline first. They split data so nothing leaks from the future or from duplicate records, choose a metric that matches the cost of each kind of error and look closely at where the model is wrong.
They debug models methodically. When performance drops, they check the data pipeline, label quality and distribution shift before tuning hyperparameters. They can explain the bias and variance trade-off in their own model, document its limits and plan how it will be monitored once real inputs start arriving.
Reviewing a model that underperforms
60 min · Learning · with Zara Q.
Zara Q. rated the session
Practitioner · after the call
Clear reasoning on problem framing and baselines. Talked through trade-offs first.
Problem framing and baselines
Deciding whether ML fits, defining the target and beating a simple baseline before adding complexity.
Data splits and leakage
Train, validation and test splits that respect time and groups, and spotting leakage early.
Model evaluation
Choosing metrics that match real error costs, calibration and error analysis by segment.
Feature engineering
Building informative features, handling categorical and missing data, and avoiding target leakage.
Training and tuning
Regularisation, cross-validation and tuning with a budget, without overfitting to the validation set.
Deployment and monitoring
Serving models, tracking drift and deciding when a model needs retraining or retiring.
What counts as evidence of machine learning skills?
In machine learning, a polished result can hide a shaky method. Lemma records the evidence behind the method: sessions where someone followed your reasoning, an adaptive test and the repositories you link, notebooks included. Each source is listed below. See the evidence methodology for how each source is weighed.
Machine learning
Mei L. · SCI recomputed 9 Oct
Evidence · 4 entries
- Rated 5.0
Reviewing a model that underperforms
Live session · 9 Oct
- Level 7.2
ML debug challenges
Adaptive assessment · 2 Oct
- Verified
An ML project on GitHub
GitHub connector · 24 Sep
- Taught · 1.5x
Teaching an ML concept
Live session · 11 Sep
Reviewing a model that underperforms
A practitioner presents a model with a hidden problem, such as leakage or a bad split. In a live session you diagnose it and explain the fix, and they rate your reasoning.
ML debug challenges
Adaptive scenario questions cover evaluation, overfitting and data issues. At higher difficulty you fix broken training or evaluation code, and the fix and explanation are scored against a rubric.
An ML project on GitHub
Connect a repository with a training pipeline, evaluation and write-up. Lemma checks it exists and that your account has access, and re-checks it periodically.
Teaching an ML concept
Explaining cross-validation or evaluation metrics to another learner with a worked example shows depth. Teaching sessions count for more than learning ones in your record.
How is a machine learning skills test run on Lemma?
The machine learning test asks 15 to 25 questions and moves up or down a level with each answer, focusing on judgement calls such as leakage, skew and bad joins. It feeds your machine learning SCI together with sessions and linked work, and the score weighs how fresh that evidence is.
Validation accuracy is 99% but the model fails in production. One feature is filled in after the outcome. What is wrong?
- AThe model is underfitting
- BThe learning rate is too high
- CTarget leakage from that feature
- DThe test set is too large
Practise core concepts
Work through AI tutor exercises on evaluation, regularisation and feature handling, with explanations in your own words. The tutor adapts to you. Drill results add only a small, capped amount to your score.
Review models with a practitioner
In live sessions, present a model or diagnose one together. A practitioner probes your choices of split, metric and features, then rates the session as evidence for machine learning.
Pass the ML assessment
Scenario questions on evaluation and data problems adjust as you answer. Higher difficulty brings code-level debugging. Failed attempts slightly lower your proof score, so preparation pays off.
Machine learning skills: common questions
How do I prove machine learning skills without industry experience?
What does a machine learning skills assessment cover?
Is a Kaggle-style project enough for an ML portfolio?
Do I need deep learning experience for this skill?
Skills related to machine learning
Browse the skills directoryPython
Show how you write, debug and structure Python, not just that you once finished a course.
Evidence for PythonData analysis
Evidence of how you frame questions, clean data and reach conclusions a decision-maker can rely on.
Evidence for data analysisData engineering
Evidence that your pipelines are reliable, testable and recoverable, reviewed by practitioners in live sessions.
Evidence for data engineeringCloud architecture
Show how you design cloud systems that scale, fail gracefully and stay affordable.
Evidence for cloud architectureStart your machine learning evidence record.
Lemma is in early access. Request an invite and we will email you when your place is ready.




